Saturday, March 29, 2025

Whitewater

After I took the big scene photos seen in yesterday's post, I turned my attention to little vignettes. I thought to capture water flowing around or by stable objects such as boulders and riverbanks, but the results were so-so.

Here they are the first two despite my reservations, both converted to b&w.


They ↑ were taken from the trail bridge. We then made our way over to the little bridge, where the river is extremely fast-flowing and it great volume, not little vignettes. It was truly whitewater over there. but I mainly shot from beside the bridge and not on it. Once again, not thrilled with the outcomes, I put different filters on these in edit looking for a satisfactory result.


It turns out that the next photo of just the fast-flowing water is my favourite, more that the previous flowing-by-things photos, above. I guess it pays to try different shots. Aside from the waves, I appreciate the colours that were captured.

Back to the bigger and higher trail bridge. While I was taking some of the other photos, Sue had spotted this ever-changing cascade by one of the bridge supports  The cascade kept changing from sparse to full and in between. The first photo shows a half-full cascade, the second is full. It kept changing, I like these as well, for the colour is pleasant to my eyes, and I don't mind how the misty whitewater to the right is overexposed and free of texture.


So, it turned out that the photos that I most wanted to take were my least favourites ones and vice versa.

I know that the next section will be almost meaningless to most of you, but Mulewings, Roentare and Spare Parts might like to read it.

I should say that the whole shoot was a bit of a struggle to remember how to work the camera as well as I would have liked. For one thing, I haven't used the camera much lately, and beyond that I seldom use a tripod, but it was needed to achieve relatively slow shutters speeds of around 1/5th of a second. That's about the speed I needed to get the blurry motion that I wanted. Secondly, I was using a variable neutral density filter to allow me to use a slow shutter because it was actually fairly bright out, and that was just one other almost unfamiliar thing to contend with, especially in changing light, depending on where I was pointing the camera. Third thing, and this really bugged me, was forgetting to attach my tripod collar to the lens, so I had to put the actual camera in the holder and that tends to unbalance things when you are using a long lens. In this case I was using a 100-400mm lens. Although, I used the full 400mm zoom in yesterday's post, the longest reach in this series was 325mm in the very first photo. The cascade photos were taken at 258mm. The one of just the whitewater was the least zoomed, at 181mm.


20 comments:

  1. Love the juxtaposition between fixed and flow.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Those blurry motion photos are wonderful--so calming and beautiful! There's something about water movement to start with and these take it to another level.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The abstract shot ... I think it is the fourth one with just the waves is fantastic. I love the textures, colors, and the feel of rushing water.
    I don't usually use a tripod either [what a pain to carry around]. But when I do, I am looking exactly for shots like this.
    It really takes the extra effort to set up the filter, tripod, and camera.

    Oh. And the first two shots? Love love love them also. Those rocks are holding fast against rushing water and mother nature. What a statement!

    ReplyDelete
  4. I like the contrasting colours in your penultimate photograph.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Love those last three shots!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I like the last shots best too.

    ReplyDelete
  7. No snow here last night and hardly any rain either.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I like the use of the filters. Very nice!

    ReplyDelete
  9. The cascades are my favorites.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I'm easy to please, I guess. I like them all!

    ReplyDelete
  11. You are getting out on time for these photos. If you wait a few days this water is gone.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I got myself a small tripod - fits into a big pocket and can be set up asymmetrically (yikes, struggled to spell that). It steadies the camera enough that I can go to about a 60th of a second. Beyond that, the gurus all say to use a cord release, and I have never bothered to get one.
    I like the rushing water with the bank in browns and taupes. And the first two tell a story of Canada and the spring, don't they?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do experiment with times. I think that even a flimsy one might do better than 1/60. Might. Worth a bit of trial and error, maybe.

      Delete
  13. There is just something about rushing water that draws one in....

    ReplyDelete
  14. Really well done! I'm glad you got out and did this.
    What a storm...

    ReplyDelete
  15. Water flow study is my favorite. This is done beautifully. I would suggest to negative compensate by 2 stops if the scene is under direct sunlight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good advice bc you have a lot of experience. In this case, I just turned the variable ND, but I am not sure how far I turned it other than it just looked right.

      Delete
  16. I think fiddling with all those things is why I gave them up. I think I still have my camera bag full of filters, gadgets and a few other lenses but I haven't opened it in nearly a decade. If I sold the occasional photograph, it would be worth it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The three middle photos really appeal to me. I tried similar things, as well as waterfalls, so I do actually understand about shutter speeds, neutral-density filters, and tripods. Good work!

    ReplyDelete
  18. I have always loved your photos...well done!
    hugs
    Donna

    ReplyDelete