Some time ago, I enlarged and adjusted the image as best I could, but one has to work with the pixels (dots) that are there, and, unfortunately, poor Uncle Syd's facial features were blank, so there was nothing there to enhance. Below, is the result after doing what I could using manual methods as well as calling upon AI to fill in the corners. It is better but a little disappointing.
There was nothing else that I could do, so I just filed it until this weekend, which is when I came across a tutorial using Adobe's latest and greatest AI tool, called Gemini 3 (with Nano Banana Pro), and I kid you not about the Nano Banana Pro part.
I went back to the original scan, not my adjusted version, and asked Gemini to Restore and Remove. I was almost stunned by the result. The tonality is so much better, and the noise is gone.
I remain pretty impressed by the results including the next photo, below. I won't show multiple versions of this one, but it was the faces that were significantly improved.
![]() |
| Sue holds her mother's hand (left), her best friend doing the same with her mother. People did dress up to go out in those days, circa 1950. Sue's mom likely made the outfits for both girls. |
Unfortunately, when I tried to process one more photo, Adobe informed me that I had reached my limit and had used all of my free trials for Gemini 3. You see, this heavy-duty AI-ing must go to Adobe's mega computers, so they charge extra for the service.
I did not wish to add to my monthly subscription at this time, but there might come a day that I do because the results are pretty impressive. Meanwhile, I can still do some AI processing on my device but not with the Nano Banana Pro version.





Those improvements are impressive but odd that AI removed the dog and the other person. Just goes to show you AI doesn't really always get it.
ReplyDeleteMy recent posts of the goats on the goat trail were done by Nano Banana Pro through Google's Gemini and I too reached my limit of tries. Funny, after doing such a wonderful job on that modern photo, it did make me think about using it on some old photos and doing exactly what you have so wonderfully done. I just hadn't found the time to try it but I'm certainly going to now, perhaps just one photo a day though so I don't have to sign up for a subscription.
ReplyDeleteI imported a photo and did my own restoration since writing this comment. More on that in a post tomorrow. I do have one question though. My restoration effort using Nano Banana Pro through Gemini put a watermark in the lower right corner of the photo which I don't see in yours. I asked it to remove it and it refused stating copyright infringement issues. Did you get a similar watermark and just removed it using other means?
DeleteNo, but I have a basic account, so I guess it was totally free.
DeleteI have just a free account as well. Perhaps whomever doesn't trust us scufflaw Americans but does you Canadians.
DeleteIt is amazing what tech can do these days. I have been impressed with my iPhones ability to remove people from photos. Some times it looks great and other times you get a blurry spot where it tried to remove and restore and image. It can only get better as tech continues to improve.
ReplyDeletehttps://retirementcoffeeshop.blogspot.com/
What a very creative and useful tool that AI can give you...with such truly excellent results! I don't know which mother and child belong to Sue in the last shot...but assume the woman on the left, and child to the left.
ReplyDeleteYes. Amazing what we assume when we post. Maybe I will update.
DeleteWonders never cease.
ReplyDeleteThat is amazing and wonderful. I have no idea how you do it but I am impressed.
ReplyDeleteAI is so hard for me. It is destroying education and the environment. But it does have some uses. *sigh*
ReplyDeleteI understand. I have my issues with it too. I feel if I can do moderate things on my computer it's okay, but the world is going a little crazy with it.
DeleteI, like NGS, have a hard time reconciling the positives of AI, such as this, with its many negatives. This is certainly a positive.
ReplyDelete