Here it is Sunday morning, and I am not going to church. In point of fact, I haven't gone to church on a Sunday morning for about 40 years, and I have been an atheist for even a little longer. I do, however, think about Christianity quite a lot, and I try to learn about it, mostly about the beginnings of the movement and who believed what and when, and how Christianity have come to be what it now is.
One might wonder, and indeed I have wondered, if I were to be a Christian, what sort of Christian would I be. This is assuming that I could possibly be a believer, but if I could become one, what would I believe?
I think, if it were possible for me to beleive, I would be a Jewish Christian. By that I don’t mean that I would become Jewish. What I do mean is that I might believe as I think the early Jewish Christians came to believe as time went on.
We know what sort of Christianity the rest of the Mediterranean world come to believe although it took a few centuries to get the doctrine straight with everyone walking on the correct doctrinal path: a path begun by Saul become Paul of Tarsus.
Essentially, Paul wrote the New Testament, and except for a book or two, what Paul didn’t write was highly influenced by his teachings. It seems pretty clear, for example, that the four gospel writers were all familiar with Paul's theology.
Paul was a man who never met Jesus and who, in his writings, gave little indication that he knew much about his Lord. While Paul had a vision of a risen and exalted Christ, he seemed either unaware or unconcerned about the teachings of the Jesus who actually walked the earth and taught what he taught. For Paul, belief in the Christ was essential, and the teachings of Jesus the man were not particularly espoused.
For the most part, Christianity has believed in Christ's atonement while almost ignoring Jesus' key teachings. Of course, there are exceptions but how many 21st century Christians love their neighbours as themselves or forgive others as God forgives them? How many love and pray for their enemies? And how is turning the other cheek going?
There does, however, appear to have been an alternate version of Christianity early in the movement, one that tried to take the teaching of Jesus to heart. They were, apparently, the Jews who stayed in Jerusalem and region and became a group known as the Ebionites, or poor ones.
This group of Christians did not believe that Jesus was the eternally existent God but that he became uniquely accepted and elevated by God at his baptism. They did not believe in a virgin birth, and not all Ebionites believed in Jesus' physical resurrection.
They did believe in keeping the Law as Jesus taught although their version of the Law did not necessarily mean the full version that other Jews may have practiced. They did seem to live communally in some way and not strive to amass personal wealth. They rejected Paul, thinking he was an apostate but venerated James the Just, the brother of Jesus whom they deemed to be true successor to Jesus. link
The Ebionites were a Jewish Christian sect that believed Jesus was a human Messiah, not a divine being, and that one must strictly follow the Jewish Law to be righteous, rejecting Paul as an apostate. They denied Jesus' divinity and virgin birth, believing he was the natural son of Joseph and Mary, adopted as God's son due to his perfect observance of the Law. Ebionites practiced asceticism, holy poverty, and religious vegetarianism, and revered Jerusalem as a holy city. (Google)
I do think that, as decades passed, stories about Jesus grew and spread around the Mediterranean: stories of miracles, healing, a virgin births, the resurrection, and so on. These are the stories that were described in the four gospels. I do not think that for the most part these were the beliefs of all of the early Jewish Christians. Apparently, their form of Christianity, the Jesus part, existed in a small pocket for another few centuries. Over time this small group faded into history, and the Christ doctrines with which we are familiar became mainstream.
If I could believe, I think I would believe more as these Jewish Ebionites believed. I don't think that I could ever believe in the virgin birth, the raising of the dead, or the feeding of the multitudes. If I could believe something, it would be that Jesus was a good teacher who taught righteous living. Just perhaps, I might come to believe that Jesus was accepted and exalted by God in a special way. Mostly, however, my religion would entail living an upright life and not hoping that adhering to the right doctrine would be the key to salvation.
Interesting write-up. I think ya just attended your own Sunday service, eh? Linda in Kansas
ReplyDeleteMaybe I should start a Sunday School class.
DeleteI'm not too far off from what you described. Even my father, an ordained minister, didn't believe there was an actual resurrection but that after Jesus' death remembering him and his teachings and following those teachings was the resurrection.
ReplyDeleteNever heard of the Ebionites. Thanks for sharing that.
I think it quite likely that someone saw, or claimed to have seen a vision of a resurrected Jesus, and that it spread from there. We know that Paul’s vision was truly that — a vision.
DeleteI appreciate your honesty in wrestling with the history of Christianity and the differences in belief through the centuries. It’s true that Paul’s influence on Christian doctrine is profound, and it is also true that Jesus’ teachings about love, forgiveness, and humility are often the hardest for people to live out consistently. For those of us who believe, the miracle of Christ is not only in the doctrines but in the transforming power of His Spirit working in daily life, helping us to forgive, to love, and to turn the other cheek when it feels impossible. I respect the way you are seeking to understand, and I pray you continue to find clarity and peace in that search. If you’d like, I invite you to read some of my recent posts as well.
ReplyDeleteI do not see ‘the church’ as ever having espoused the things that Jesus taught, but good for you for trying in your own way.
DeleteVery interesting post. Thank you for sharing.
ReplyDeleteI'm not a religious scholar by any means but both Paul and Jesus were in Jerusalem at the same time for upwards of 10 years as Paul "discipled" under a prominent Jewish Rabi and he likely traveled many of the same roads between Jerusalem and Tarsus as Jesus was preaching along them. I would guess he knew and perhaps even ran into Jesus from time to time even if he didn't specifically say so because Jesus was the "talk of the town" at that time. As Saul, he was close with Peter the disciple of Jesus so even if he never crossed paths, he was close to an excellent source.
ReplyDeleteThat’s a whole pile of assumptions that I haven’t even heard apologists make although I guess you have.
DeleteThis is fascinating, something I"m not familiar with but I'm inclined to agree with you. When I think if Christianity, I think only of the goodness of Jesus, kindness, compassion, sticking up for those who have little. It makes me angry when so-called Christians don't live or act by his words and deeds. As for the Bible, it's hard to take with any degree of literal thought something written based on so much oral history, written many years later and adapted and edited by so many faiths. It's a guide, perhaps, with good stories. But I'm not sure I can take it to the bank as written.
ReplyDeleteI think that you have a rather good handle on it.
DeleteHello AC, how’s it going? How was your weekend? I read in your profile that you’re fond of gardening and reading. I think we have something in common there, because I love both too.
ReplyDeleteHave a fabulous day, AC
I'm sorry, I just don't see why there's anything of value in "believing" or even anything about it worth giving any thought to. If you find something of value in the New Testament, you can just take it for what it is, without any thought of associating it with supernatural or mythological beliefs.
ReplyDeleteThe Superman comic books depict Superman as a good person with good morals, but that doesn't inspire me to think about believing he really existed.
Billions do, and I like to dig around it try to understand how it all came about.
Delete'Do as you would be done by' as Charles Kingsley advised in 'The Water Babies.' That seems a reasonable way to live.
ReplyDeleteA good version of the golden rule.
DeleteMy experience with 'good christians' is they use religion as a bludgeon. Believe what I believe or you are condemned to an eternity in hell. I've been told a few times by people I thought I knew I was going to hell, even if I did not do anything particularly hell worthy. Just because I didn't hold their beliefs. If there is a hell, many of these folks are in for a surprise.
ReplyDeleteIt has always been about believing the right things, not in being the right person.
DeleteI'm Agnostic, I'm not religious at all.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you on much of this and also despair of what Christianity has turned into--many denominations anyway. John says that all organized religion is a cult; his point is that when you are taxed to blindly follow a book that was written by people thousands of years ago then translated, mis-translated, etc. and told to take everything on faith (versus facts), you are in a cult.
ReplyDeleteThroughout my life, most of the people I trust were teachers, those who knew they didn't have all the answers, those who never peddled in shame and judgment.
ReplyDelete