Wednesday, August 27, 2025

My Deconversion Story

When I posted my recent churchy blogs that I shall link at the end, people seemed very interested in hearing about my faith story or actually loss of faith. 

You know my churchy background by now, but you may not know that I continued to be a very committed Christian until my mid-30s. In point of fact, there was a time when I thought of leaving teaching to retrain as a minister. 

In those years after our marriage in 1969, Sue and I attended various evangelical churches — Pentecostal, Free Methodist, Associated Gospel, and even the occasional Baptist service. This lasted into the 1980s. I loved being an evangelical Christian, and church music is still what plays in my head more than any other. The music still gives me feelings or at least memories of feelings.

Near the end of my faith period, I led a little couples bible study of just 3 couples. It was great. We all enjoyed our times together. When the sessions concluded because one couple was moving away, one of the guys loaned me a set of creationist tapes. At the end of the tapes, the presenter went on about the continents zooming around after the flood, just 4000 years ago.

I knew enough about the study of plate tectonics to realize that was balderdash. However, it shouldn't have affected me because I hadn't been a young earth creationist to begin with. I knew the earth was old, but believed in guided evolution or Intelligent Design as they call it now. I knew that it had been 200 million years since the planets were together in the form of Pangea and that they have been moving to their present position for all of that time and that they are still on the move. While I won't go into it, the science is irrefutable. 

All along, I had known about geologic time yet still also believed the gospel. Science and belief were not incompatible in my mind. However, it was realizing the absurdity of the claim that the continents had shifted dramatically just a few thousand years ago that made me think of time differently. It suddenly hit me that, geologically speaking, the earth hadn't required divine intervention for 200 million years. Geology just grinded on and on. I had never thought of it this way. 

I realized that the planet hadn't needed a guiding god for 200 million years. That's a rather long time.

As people and Christians, we have this notion that we are special and that god created us with a special purpose. If that were the case, he really took his time getting around to creating humans. And it wasn't just 200 million years but actually 4.5 billion years that our planet had existed. And then . . . when you figure that the universe is 13.7 billion years old, the notion of the earth and humans being specially created at the whim of a god suddenly made no sense to me.

That was it. I stopped believing in that instant. It wasn't deliberate; I couldn't help myself. For many EXvangelicals, deconstruction is a long and panful journey. They struggle mightily to find reasons to hang onto their faith, but in the end they cannot. That wasn't my experience. I believed in one moment and not in the next. I had no control over this. You can't force yourself to believe what you don't believe.

Although I had loved being a Christian, I no longer believed after that sudden and unanticipated momentary flash of insight. There was nothing more to my deconversion. Christians tend to assume that ex-believers were unhappy about their, perhaps, restricted lifestyles, but that wasn't true for me or for others whom I have encountered. 

For many, deconstruction is a most painful journey. For me, the shift was instantaneous and natural. I still attended church with the family for some time afterward and not unhappily.

I am not sad about having once believed or having been raised the way that I was. I am not mad at a god whom I don't believe exists. I simply don't believe although, oddly enough, I still love to sing the songs of Zion, as some might call them. Gospel music is the main music in my head, which I know is weird for an atheist.

What I I don't remember from those days is evangelicalism being as mean-spirited or so anti-intellectual. We graduated scholars from my youth group: scientists, doctors, professors and mere teachers like me. My late brother-in-law, for example, was a highly intelligent and educated professor who believed deeply. Non-belief isn't a matter of intelligence, but I suspect it is often a matter of being honest about confronting truth and reality.

I think that we come to the end of this sequence of posts at last. I hope that I have answered your questions.

=================

For the record, these are the posts that led to this one.

Remembering the Foo
Evangel Temple
It Bagan on Drummond Street



27 comments:

  1. Very interesting journey, AC. I need to read those posts, since I didn't know the history.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You've given me a lot to consider. I agree with about all you've said yet why do I still go to Church? Looking for a sense of community? An outlet to care for others? To reinforce the lessons of how to live found in the New Testament?
    Dan is much farther along and thinks like you. He sees all the holes in the sermons and teachings. I'm still struggling and I will say that I am disappointed with the church we joined because I'm not feeling a sense of community nor hearing the lessons of how to live in these times. The church we attended in Maryland did a better job with all of that.
    Thanks for sharing this, AC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It can b an anxious journey for many, and even for believers, it can be difficult to find a suitable community.

      Delete
  3. I guess I fall in the believer category but have no issues with the earth being 13+ billion years old. Our church accepts evolution and the age of the earth.

    As I have told other atheist friends that have talked to me about religion, I would rather be a believer that was wrong and wasted my time being part of a community of people than to be a non-believer who was wrong and spends eternity in a non-desirable place. I don't mean that as shade against you AC because I am a believer of religious freedom and that includes non-believers. It is just to say that I personally would rather be a believer that is wrong than a non-believer that is wrong.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It wasn't evolution or time themselves, but the implications. I was trying to say in my post, but I seem to have failed, that belief or non-belief isn't a choice. If you don't believe, you can't make yourself believe, and vice versa I suspect.

      Delete
  4. Thanks for explaining your spiritual journey. I have listened to many newcomers to the Unitarian churches share similar experiences, where they were disillusioned by the teachings of their original faiths...and I sure am one of them! But I don't remember anyone else saying they had a moment of insight like you did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I have never seen such an experience related by anyone else. I am like the apostle Paul in reverse. 😊

      Delete
  5. Ed is a believer in Pascal's wager. I think a lot of people value the social side of church attendance, a feeling of belonging in a group.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have felt that Pascal's Wager applies mostly to Catholics. More than Protestants, they can do the right things, keep the sacraments etc, and that may be enough. Protestants can't just jeep the rules; they either believe or not, and as I tried to indicate, belief is not actually a choice.

      Delete
  6. Interesting journey, AC. If god is what people profess her to be, she wouldn’t hold it against you, would she?

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is interesting, AC. That's something that normally happens over time. Mark was raised a conservative Catholic, the holier-than-thou type. He started questioning as a young man. His family has blamed me for his not believing but that was set in motion long before I came along. I was not raised with religious belief.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are an evil soul to lead that poor boy away from the truth. 😀

      Delete
  8. So simply stated, you can't make yourself believe what you don't believe. I don't know that I've heard from anyone that it was just one second to make their mind shift. I do think a lot of people get comfort and community from church and that's a.o.k.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thank you for sharing and explaining your journey.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Excellent explanation. Interesting to think about the different ways we change - some long time slow losses and some, like you, a quick flash. Love the post. Off to read the others.
    For me, it was a Sunday School teacher pointing to the ceiling and describing heaven. But that is an attic, right? I think I was about ten. And I tried hard to cling to my mythos. Got confirmed, joined the church, rejoined when we moved, all that. Yeah.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Interesting post John. I was raised Presbyterian but practiced Lutheran as an adult. What drove me away was politics within our old church. They even drove our beloved pastor away from the church for goodness sake.
    One question that is on my mind a lot...how do "they" know how old the earth, let alone the galaxy, is?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. For one thing, they can measure the half life of various isotopes as the 'deteriorate' to their next state. Don't ask me to remember what they are right now, but I have read it in the past, and I'm sure you can too, if you are intersted.

      Delete
  12. Very interesting journey you have written and the comments are also interesting. In my own manner of thinking I have a notion that there are two competing variables that go into a person’s proclivity towards having or not having a faith group. One variable is the general thought mindset a person inherently has at their core. There are two primary “camps” of thought mindset….. “clumpers” and “splitters”. That is the first variable that I see as influential. The other variable that also comes into play what I think of as the “malleability” of a person’s upbringing….. and this malleability also falls into two “camps” which I tend to equate with the terms of either “concrete” or “abstract”. I believe that the blend a person has of these two camps plays a strong role in a person’s “faith-or-non-faith” pathway they experience in life.

    You have given me food for thought. Perhaps I will in the near future try to espouse more on what I think helps to explain these variations in a post on my site.

    PipeTobacco

    ReplyDelete
  13. Very interesting journey. We change as we grow and learn of other things. I think it's only human to question things that we are taught. I was raised Baptist on my moms side and Mormon on my dads side. I went to both churches as a kid. Had bible study on the weekends, went to primary school at the Mormon church for 2 hours after school each day and was blessed in the Mormon temple in Utah. As I grew older I stopped believing. I'm Agnostic now.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I found this a very interesting read. Thank you for sharing it.

    ReplyDelete
  15. A very interesting story of your life. Thank you for sharing it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I love bluegrass gospel music but don't consider myself a Christian, so it sometimes feels hypocritical of me but hell, " we contain multitudes," don't we?

    ReplyDelete
  17. The last sentence in your second last paragraph says it all. Each person who leaves the faith has a different story...some of them very sad. Like you, the music still runs in my head. It took me a long time to realize that I was a non believe. I think we get some very bad press.

    ReplyDelete
  18. It’s a clear, thoughtful account of a journey many will recognise parts of, even if their own path was different

    ReplyDelete
  19. It is a Journey, each of us has, whether Spiritually leaning or not. I'm fascinated by all of Creation and figure something Created it all, if I'm calling it God then it doesn't mean I have it all figured out. I don't like any Organized Religion, seems quite divisive to Humanity to me, but I've attended Churches too off and on... more off than on. I am still Spiritually leaning myself but don't find a connection to those who consider themselves to be "Religious" and have some Religious Label they ascribe to. I just don't Need it, no void to fill there for me personally.

    ReplyDelete